SHOPS CLOSED, RIGHTS IGNORED: Balancing Accountability and Human Dignity

As we highlight the issue of expired goods and labour violations in this month’s cover story, it is imperative to reflect on the actions of two key players in this battle: the Ministry of Labour and the Malawi Bureau of Standards (MBS). Their recent measures to crack down on non-compliant businesses—closing shops and companies that violate labour laws, stock expired goods, or fail to meet hygiene standards—are indeed steps in the right direction. However, these actions, while commendable, warrant deeper scrutiny.

The closures send a strong message that the government prioritizes the welfare of its citizens over unscrupulous profit motives. Unsafe working conditions and expired goods are not mere inconveniences; they are threats to public health, employee dignity, and the overall economic trust that drives market stability. In that sense, the Ministry of Labour and MBS have ignited a much-needed conversation about accountability in Malawi’s business sector.

However, not all efforts have been without controversy. Minister of Labour Vitumbiko Mumba, while spearheading commendable initiatives, has faced criticism for his abrasive approach. Incidents such as dragging a woman at Central Poultry Factories in Lilongwe—deemed harassment by some observers—highlight a troubling contradiction. While fighting for workers’ rights, the minister has been accused of violating the very principles of respect and human dignity that his office should uphold. While urgency is important in enforcing labour laws, a calmer, more inclusive approach that seeks to hear both sides of the story would ensure justice is served without overstepping human rights boundaries.

But is closure alone sufficient? For long-term change, punitive measures like fines and mandatory corrective actions are essential. When a shop or company is shut down, the immediate impact is a deterrent. However, this approach can also disrupt livelihoods and local economies without addressing the root causes. Heavy penalties, combined with robust inspection frameworks and ongoing monitoring, could prove more sustainable in ensuring compliance.

Moreover, we must ask ourselves whether these enforcement measures are reactive rather than preventive. Why are expired goods and unsafe working conditions becoming such a prevalent issue? Could it be that supply chain inefficiencies, lack of enforcement, and inadequate business training contribute to this problem? The government must look beyond closures to systemic solutions. Investing in training programs for businesses, enhancing supply chain transparency, and providing incentives for ethical practices can go a long way in addressing these issues at their core.

Equally critical is the role of consumers in this fight. Educating Malawians on their rights as buyers and workers can empower them to hold businesses accountable. Advocacy groups and the media must amplify these efforts, ensuring that citizens are vigilant and proactive in reporting irregularities.

While the Ministry of Labour and MBS deserve recognition for taking bold steps, this is only the beginning. Malawi needs a culture of compliance built on trust, accountability, and the shared goal of a prosperous future. Closures may grab headlines, but real progress lies in fostering a business environment that values quality, ethics, and the well-being of its people.

Let us not settle for short-term fixes. Instead, let us demand sustainable solutions and humane leadership that align with the vision of a healthier, safer, and more ethical Malawi.